In an effort to quantify Christian belief and practice into something that finds play in the language of the political sphere of life, I find myself using the expression of a “moral agenda”. What I mean by that is the drawing out of one’s faith into a ‘political platform’ of proposed laws, practices, and other impositions on life that come from the government.
Some historic examples of the ‘moral agenda’ of the church
include the call to Crusade from the papal authorities in the medieval
period. For the promise of forgiveness
of sins and the promise of heaven, soldiers from kings on down were encouraged
to go East to 'liberate the Holy Land’ from the Muslims. God's forgiveness as a medium of exchange for political or
economic ends came to a head at the moment of the Reformation over the
purchases of indulgences.
When tax money is used to pay the salary of clergy, we have
another application of the “moral agenda”.
Such things occurred in North America as well as England and
elsewhere.
Blue laws, where businesses are not permitted to open on
Sundays because that is the day to go to church is another plank in a “moral
agenda”. A town that does not permit the
sale of alcohol within its borders is another.
We may be more familiar with the calls of Christian
Nationalism that are going on here and in other countries. Such movements often have an extremely
thorough ‘moral agenda’ that is foundational to their movement. Issues like abortion, sexual and gender
identity, who gets to be married, and so on are often at the center of such
agendas.
And explicitly Christian moral agendas can be at odds with one
another. Take the issue of abortion. Certain Christians feel that a
woman should lose control over her body at the moment of conception. Other Christians feel that women should have complete autonomy over their bodies at all times. Both come to these conclusions from their understanding of God's Word. One group of Christians can then demonize
another group for having the wrong moral agenda.
I believe
the blessing of our country is that it is deliberately founded as a secular
nation. That people of faith are free to
practice their religions and to be informed by their beliefs in making moral
and political choices. The moral agenda is present, but implicit rather than explicit. I am very
much against any idea of this being a “Christian” nation. Christian history of political authority runs red
with blood. And if we believe God is
all-powerful, what Jesus-motivated reason could we have for wanting political
authority? Like God needs our help. We would probably do better to obey God
instead of always trying to help God along.
James said
that our faith without works is dead. I
agree with that statement (which is probably good as I believe the Bible is God’s
Word). But how we do faithful work is
something good Christians need to think about (to build a theology about). Political power and its pursuit in the name
of doing the work of faith is a place where I believe we need to tread very
lightly. Power and temptation and
corruption are proven bed fellows across the world and throughout history.
Thinking in
terms of a moral agenda, what I, as a person of faith, want to see put into
political and legislative practice, is an important way for us to be clear in
our faith and how we wish to see it work.
It is a good way for us to keep an eye on things when they are working
badly or turned to sin.
Peace,
Pastor Peter
No comments:
Post a Comment