Thursday, September 30, 2021

“To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.”

                 The meme said that this is a quote from Thomas Paine.  It calls him an “English-American political activist, writer, and revolutionary.”  But did he really say this?  Some memes put some great quotes out there.  Some of them are actually accurate.  According to Google, this one is rightly attributed to Mr. Paine.

                So I had this whole, long, rather clever blog post playing with this quote, considering how it goes back to the founding of the nation, but how true it is today.  It was a rather oversized political consideration of the nation and we who live in her.

                But there were two problems.  I knew it needed to end with a consideration of the faith, but how to make that jump while maintaining the integrity of the blog post to that moment?  The other problem was one that guides me when sermons go wandering, the question of ‘staying in my lane’ as a Christian and a pastor.

                And Mr. Paine’s quote could apply as powerfully to matters of faith as it could to political matters.  That opens up a whole new can of worms on the connection between faith and reason.  But I think it is not that theological or philosophical or even presuppositional for the Christian. 

                Consider the colonial foundations of this nation.  Religious groups who found themselves persecuted, imprisoned, even killed by trial or in open warfare, many found a new start over here.  It was a good use of reason to get out of the ‘firing line’ of the ‘old world’.  On the other hand, for me, a sure sign that the use of reason has been renounced in the Christian faith is when a person or persons of faith slip away from the plain meaning of the text where Jesus says the law is to love God and love neighbor.

                Consider the Puritans in colonial Massachusetts.  They reasoned that a new world meant new freedom for their interpretive structure of the Christian faith.  And it worked.  But how far was the use of reason renounced when it came to the cruel and vicious ways in which they killed their own during the witch trials?  Paine’s expression, renouncing reason being like giving medicine to the dead, it resonates.  Where was the love of God and the love of neighbor there?

                Consider the modern era.  The KKK was a declared ‘Christian’ institution.  The Christian love of God and neighbor is finding expression in branding the ‘others’ of our present day and age.  Immigrants and people outside tightly bound “biblical” definitions of gender come to mind.  OMG, does that make me a “big L” liberal?  It takes the renunciation of reason to suspend the law of love and condemn our neighbor with the arrogance of doing so ‘in Jesus’ name’.  Explain to me how the suspension of “big L” love leads to “big L” liberal and I will take on that question.

                Shall we explore the underpinnings of the “Black Lives Matter” movement?  As a privileged white male moving into the upper reaches of the mid-point region of my life, I know few people more ill-equipped to speak on behalf of someone else on this matter.  Does not mean I am not dumb enough to try, but not today.

                In my original post, I was appalled and relieved to read this quote from Thomas Paine.  That much has not changed as I have moved away from a political point of view to a Christian one.  I am relieved that the renunciation of reason is not just the product of the current age, with the Christian justifications for unloving activities woven into the polar opposites of the political spectrum.  But I am also appalled that in the centuries of Christian expression in the “New World”, we seem to have learned so little in how the Love of God and of our neighbor is the universal law of the Lord.

Peter Hofstra

Thursday, September 23, 2021

"Flunking Sainthood" by Jana Riess, I found it meaningful and here, in brief, is why.

     Flunking Sainthood, or, as on the cover “fLunking sainthooed”-except the “e” in sainthood is “x’ed” out, not doubly struck through, which was the closest I could find in Word-by Jana Reiss is a memoir in the style of a couple other books I have read about doing “biblical” or “Christian” things for a fixed period, for a year. 

One of them is The Year of Living Biblically by A.J. Simpson, taking the Scriptural law and applying it to how a man should live today.   The other, which I read with the mindset of being ‘a female response’, is A Year of Biblical Womanhood by Rachel Held Evans.  The call and response between these two volumes was a delight.  The Bible is a sexist book, written in a time when there was not even the conception of something called sexism.  In each one I found new insights into studying the Bible, or “Christianity: The Sinner’s Manual”.  Jana Reiss offered something different.

According to the rear blurb, “…Jana Reiss shares a year-long quest to become more saintly by tackling twelve spiritual practices…” and then going on to list them, one per month.  The result of this year-long experiment is evident in the bio, also on the back cover.  “Jana Riess is the author or editor…so on and so forth… Although she is a spiritual failure…she has a doctorate…”  This is highly selective, but measures the success of the experiment.

Another measure of the success comes on the front cover, in considering the extended title of this volume: Flunking Sainthood: A Year of Breaking the Sabbath, Forgetting to Pray, and Still Loving My Neighbor. 

So monthly for a year, she pursued a different ‘spiritual discipline’.  Each chapter relates the events of each month.  She provides us with the resources that she curated for each discipline, describes her methodology, and her results.  As I read it, it reminded me of applying ‘the scientific method’ I learned long, long ago to each of these disciplines, essentially seeking its effectiveness in an attempt, I presume, to reproduce the effectiveness among its original adherents.  Except that it never quite worked out that way.  Which was the delight of science.  Even a failure added to the sum increase of our knowledge and wisdom.

I was frankly relieved, having tried and failed at a few of these practices myself.  If there is one thing that pastors are good at, it is not necessarily spiritual disciplines.  It is the sure and certain knowledge that we humans are highly fallible and in need of God’s grace.  This book is an honest expression of the human being, humorous and touching and redeeming in turn. 

I came away with three things.  One is an instant reference to where to start learning about any of the disciplines from her year.  She’s picked winners in these areas of life.  The second is that spiritual disciplines do not and are not meant to ‘fix us’.  This is NOT a self-help regimen, these disciplines have been developed to bring Providence more meaningfully into our existence.  And finally, while Jana Riess had her racked up a perfect record of failures in keeping the disciplines, it is evident that they did what they were supposed to, bringing one searcher a little deeper into the joy that is our relationship with God.

 

The Book: “Flunking Sainthood”, by Jana Riess.  Brewster, Massachusetts, Paraclete Press, 2011.  I finished it mid-September of 2021.