Wednesday, May 26, 2021

If Jesus Was Frustrated Then When People Refused To Accept Him, How About After Generations Of Christian Violence?

May 26, 2021              John 5: 40-41

39 ‘You search the scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that testify on my behalf. 40Yet you refuse to come to me to have life. 41I do not accept glory from human beings. 42But I know that you do not have the love of God in you. 43I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not accept me; if another comes in his own name, you will accept him. 44How can you believe when you accept glory from one another and do not seek the glory that comes from the one who alone is God? 45Do not think that I will accuse you before the Father; your accuser is Moses, on whom you have set your hope. 46If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. 47But if you do not believe what he wrote, how will you believe what I say?’

            There is frustration in Jesus’ words in verse 40.  The Jewish Leadership is looking for something, it is looking for eternal life.  That is the Messianic Expectation that gives them hope against the Romans.  The idea that there will be an heir of David to sit on that great king’s throne forever.  Christianity has the idea of eternal life fairly thoroughly worked out.  It did not ever really occur to me to consider that the Jews had that same expectation, that same desire, in that time and place. 

            Where does that lack of awareness come from?  I think it is from what I know of Judaism today, distancing itself from Christianity.  And as we read Jesus here, as we progress through the New Testament, it may strike us as weird that the Judaism would distance itself from Christianity, as we developed from Judaism, through Jesus.  But to read the history between our religions since the time of Jesus, it is NO wonder to me at all that Judaism wants to keep a safe distance from Christianity.  We do NOT have a good record of dealing with our brothers and sisters in Christ.

            I have never really progressed past the military and political expectations of the Messiah at the time of Jesus, and then in focus on the ways that Jesus did NOT fit those expectations.  There is an interpretive note that “we” Christians got Jesus ‘right’ while the Jewish Leadership got him ‘wrong’.  That breeds arrogance, ‘us’ versus ‘them’. 

            Jesus seems to build on that theme when he goes on to say he does not accept glory from human beings.  I think that is a two-edged statement.  On the one edge, the purpose of humanity, according to the Westminster Standards, is to glorify God and enjoy God forever.  That is a “God the Father” thing, and Jesus, standing as an intermediary, is, I believe, on the one hand, saying that he will not accept the glory of human beings for himself over and against the Father.

            But I also believe there is another piece to this.  Refusing the ‘glory’ of human beings is meant to prevent any hint of self-aggrandizement in the eyes of the people.  It is to try and prevent exactly what has happened, an ‘us’ and ‘them’ turning into ‘us’ versus ‘them’ in matters of faith.  As I have said, our history with Judaism is not good as a religion.

            That leads to another thing.  It was very tough for me, an American Presbyterian in the 21st century, to look back on the blood and horror of Christian history without pointing at it and saying “That isn’t me.”  This is not limited to the times when Jews have been assaulted, exiled, and killed by Christians, many times on the excuse “They killed Jesus” (which is why I am careful to look at the Jewish leadership in considering Jesus’ debates).

            It is not just about how my faith has treated others, but the religious wars within my faith.  “You believe wrong therefore I will kill you.”  I do not know just how far we can remove ourselves from the love and purpose of Jesus when we fall into that kind of thinking.  And it is ‘we’.  Christians are Christians.  I have never killed anybody in the name of Jesus, so I have two choices when it comes to Christian history.  The first is to deny it, that “my” Christianity is somehow better than “their” Christianity.  Or I accept it.  This was done in Jesus’ name.  It is wrong and we are seeking to do better.

            Because that is the very nature of faith.  We have Jesus’ forgiveness and are called upon to strive to do better, knowing that Jesus will pick us up again even when we fall.  There are compelling reasons why Jesus’ words back in John “Yet you refuse to come to me to have life” still resonate today.  It is the history of violence and sin that marks our own history.  Today, we have it packed away, glossed over.  Cannot tell you the last time I used the Crusades or the religious wars after the Reformation as a sermon illustration.  There will be freedom when we do comes to terms with it.  More later.

            Peace, Pastor Peter   

No comments: