Monday, April 19, 2021

Moving Back into Familiar Territory: Return to Galilee

April 19, 2021             John 4: 43-46

39 Many Samaritans from that city believed in him because of the woman’s testimony, ‘He told me everything I have ever done.’ 40So when the Samaritans came to him, they asked him to stay with them; and he stayed there for two days. 41And many more believed because of his word. 42They said to the woman, ‘It is no longer because of what you said that we believe, for we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this is truly the Savior of the world.’

43 When the two days were over, he went from that place to Galilee 44(for Jesus himself had testified that a prophet has no honor in the prophet’s own country). 45When he came to Galilee, the Galileans welcomed him, since they had seen all that he had done in Jerusalem at the festival; for they too had gone to the festival.

46 Then he came again to Cana in Galilee where he had changed the water into wine. Now there was a royal official whose son lay ill in Capernaum. 47When he heard that Jesus had come from Judea to Galilee, he went and begged him to come down and heal his son, for he was at the point of death. 48Then Jesus said to him, ‘Unless you see signs and wonders you will not believe.’ 

            So after two days with the Samaritans, Jesus goes north.  The northern edge of Samaria borders on the Jezreel Valley, in which Nazareth is situated.  The Galileans welcome him because they’d seen Jesus at the festival in Jerusalem.  This was the Passover festival, back in John 2.  What they had witnessed was Jesus turning out the money changers and the sacrifice sellers from the Temple.  So there was something powerful in Jesus that they were seeing.  But notice there is this odd infix in the paragraph.

            He went to Galilee, they welcomed him, but in verse 44, parenthetically (which means ‘in parentheses’), Jesus had prophesied that a prophet had no honor in their own country.  In the other gospels, there are records of Jesus returning to Nazareth, where this exact reaction took place.  The people of Nazareth did not see Jesus as the Messiah or as a Rabbi, but as the son of Joseph, the carpenter.  That was a blue-collar job.  For Jesus to come around as a Teacher is, for them, the work of a poser.  Jesus is ‘above his station’ because while there is evidence that the Jews were a highly literate people, the Teacher ‘class’, the Rabbis, the Pharisees and so on, they were all about education.  The support of the people was given them so they could study and become properly learned in the ways of the Hebrew Bible.  Jesus never had that kind of training. 

            I remember one preacher talking about how the people who ‘changed Jesus’ diapers’ would have a different point of view, they would know the little kid who was now the man before them.  I believe what John is doing here is acknowledging the other gospels, that go more fully into this encounter Jesus has at Nazareth.  What happened there is not his focus, is not part of his narrative, but it is a part of Jesus’ story, so he does acknowledge it.  John also puts Jesus in Cana as his first fixed spot in Galilee.  This town is just north of Nazareth and, at the Wedding of Cana, two chapters back, it seems there was a regional invitation that included him so it would seem likely that Jesus came through Nazareth to get there (thus the reference to prophets and their home towns).

            Nazareth was in the Jezreel Valley, Galilee was centered more on the Sea of Galilee, and it was to this region that Jesus went.  It was there that the locals, who’d seen him in Jerusalem, were now gathering to know more.  I find myself pondering their reaction.  What Jesus did was essentially a political statement, defying the norms and the practices of the Jewish leadership.  It is not the ‘typical’ gospel reaction, where the miracles and the preaching of Jesus open the way for his presence. 

            It is also interesting to note that the people here who welcomed him were not acknowledging the ‘baptismal competition’ that was being styled as happening between Jesus and John the Baptist.  That was the reason Jesus pulled back to Sychar in the first place, to remove himself from that kind of attitude among the people on the Jordan River. 

            It strikes me that there is an application of the ‘Come and See’ focus that we have already come across in John.  The Galileans saw Jesus in Jerusalem, they saw what he did and recognized him for it.  Now they are coming to see for themselves.  As mentioned above, Jesus arrives in Cana, where he did his water into wine miracle.  From there, we transition into the next part of the narrative, with the royal official from Capernaum.

            More tomorrow.

Peace, Pastor Peter

No comments: