This is the lowest Holy Week of our church. It is the last time we are down like this. Today, it is a message of Jesus even at his lowest, emerging in triumph. For the last winter, we have been battered. As a small congregation, we have been battered.
But the Lord is faithful, faithful indeed. Follow the progress of our Holy Week here.
Peace.
Peter Hofstra
Sunday, March 29, 2015
Sunday, March 15, 2015
To the Actors of Urinetown
“Urinetown (the Ode)”
(When I can’t think of a good title, I call it an “Ode”-sounds
like Shakespeare)
Peter Hofstra
Oh we are the kids of
Edison High
We’re a fun and a goofy
lot;
We did a play called
Urinetown,
That’s the name, I shit
you not.
It’s been a fun and interesting
time,
Our bathrooms will never
be the same.
I leave a quarter whenever
I flush,
I will not carry the blame
(shame?)
Miss Singer, she has
yelled so much
But it could have been
lots worse
We all could have gotten
some nasty pink eye,
And all without a nurse.
The play, it is over now,
We’ve had our final call,
And whenever I sing “Amazing
Grace”
I’m going to giggle or
bawl,
Do you want to go to
Urinetown
As for me, I think not,
I’m not one for head long
dives,
That end in a sudden stop.
Of course, I’d get some
angel wings,
Well, probably devil
horns,
But rather some heat while
I have some fun,
Then, I can be forlorn.
Amazing Grace, I find it
here,
In the faces of all of
you,
This song is just my
little gift
Because you’ve blessed me
too.
To be sung to the tune of "Amazing Grace"...or the theme to "Gilligan's Island"
Tuesday, February 10, 2015
What is the Spirit?
“The Spirit is the core of the human being
from which arises the decision to decide or decay, to live or die, to overcome
or knuckle under.”
This
is the ‘spirit’ in spiritual care. This
is the generic trans-religious interpretation of the human being that, I
believe, connects the work of all faiths in the world. And that sounds so bland and boring. See how the Spirit is illustrated in Staff
Sergeant Paul Worley of the USMC, awarded the Silver Star in 2010. While in combat…
Worley didn’t even realize he had
been hit until he saw blood: A round had struck his thigh. “I was so full of adrenaline, it really didn’t
matter,” he said. He pulled down his
trousers, patched up the wound-dismissing the platoon corpsman to help the more
seriously wounded-and continued to resupply his men’s waning supply of
ammunition and direct their fire. On the
radio, a lieutenant relayed that higher command wanted him evacuated.
“I told them fuck no, that I was
busy.”
I believe we were made this way,
with a Spirit at our core that makes or breaks us. As a Christian, I accept that this is in the
image of God’s Holy Spirit, that part of my Lord that pushes me beyond
myself. That is the part of the man or
the woman that the chaplain can work with.
It is the part of us that deals with the ultimate things of life, the
universe, and everything.
I do not
have the authority to edit the words of a hero.
Tuesday, February 3, 2015
Death: The Christian Answer
If we are going to discuss death, we need to have some
background on the Christian point of view concerning death. In my faith, it is not the ‘forever good-bye’. It is, rather, punishment for sins committed
against God, but a death sentence that has been commuted to life eternal by the
death and resurrection of someone else.
I stand up at funerals and share the promise of the gospel,
that in Christ, death is but a doorway, a way station, until such time as we
are all united once again. It kind of
sucks for those who are not Christians, but I am the advocate of a God of
Mercy, not a God of Vengeance, so I think it takes a whole lot to take on death
as punishment (but it can be done).
But unlike some of my colleagues, I do not share this as a
scare tactic for mourners to get their act together before they get laid
out. I share this as hope for somewhere
down the line, somewhere through the grieving process, somewhere when the
feelings of the death have begun to integrate back into the person’s being.
I will be the first to admit, it doesn’t do much for the
shock moments of death, for the traumas that follow losing someone, especially
if you are carrying the burden of perhaps doing something that could have saved
their life. But it carries the
possibilities that things can be okay again, someday.
Charlie Hebdo: Owning the Deaths
Bradley Cooper, in an interview about "The American Sniper", made a very interesting comment about art, not from the point of view of the artist, but the recipient. When "art" is made, it is for the consumer to own and react to. We are not taking about buying the artwork to 'own' it. Ownership comes from interaction, from consideration, from a reaction informed by our connection to that artwork. And the "art" of Charlie Hebdo led to mass murder.
The sum total of my experience with Charlie Hebdo is a cursory internet search of cover images. Now, I like satire. And it ain't Mad magazine. And it sure ain't Monty Python. My idiomatic French is enough to be offended by what they are doing. I have owned the "art" of Charlie Hebdo as far as I care to. I've been provoked, and I, the consumer, do not find it to particularly appealing.
I have experience with people of my own faith who have, in the name of religion, come out in criticism of some piece of "art", whether photographs by Mapplethorpe, a magazine by Larry Flint, this movie or that book or such a video. Whatever is being criticized, rarely have the critics seen or listened to or experienced the art in question. There is no 'ownership'. I wonder if the terrorists ever actually read Charlie Hebdo. Or did somebody tell them what to think and what to do?
Here is the real kick in the pants for me. I have been trying to figure out why this has provoked my thinking. It just clicked. This is how Jesus died. He was crucified for things people thought he had done. He was killed for political expediency and by a conspiracy of the powers that were at that time who did not like what he had to say.
I know God has a sense of humor. My own vocation as a pastor is proof of that. But is there a transcendent satire here
The sum total of my experience with Charlie Hebdo is a cursory internet search of cover images. Now, I like satire. And it ain't Mad magazine. And it sure ain't Monty Python. My idiomatic French is enough to be offended by what they are doing. I have owned the "art" of Charlie Hebdo as far as I care to. I've been provoked, and I, the consumer, do not find it to particularly appealing.
I have experience with people of my own faith who have, in the name of religion, come out in criticism of some piece of "art", whether photographs by Mapplethorpe, a magazine by Larry Flint, this movie or that book or such a video. Whatever is being criticized, rarely have the critics seen or listened to or experienced the art in question. There is no 'ownership'. I wonder if the terrorists ever actually read Charlie Hebdo. Or did somebody tell them what to think and what to do?
Here is the real kick in the pants for me. I have been trying to figure out why this has provoked my thinking. It just clicked. This is how Jesus died. He was crucified for things people thought he had done. He was killed for political expediency and by a conspiracy of the powers that were at that time who did not like what he had to say.
I know God has a sense of humor. My own vocation as a pastor is proof of that. But is there a transcendent satire here
Monday, February 2, 2015
Charlie Hebdo: Dying for Art's Sake
There was a discussion on the radio this morning concerning a panel discussion on the role of art in the aftermath of the shooting of the Charlie Hebdo offices in Paris. The one line that stuck with me from the discussion was along the lines of defending someone's right to express themselves even when that expression runs completely contrary to what you consider proper and decent.
The discussion went all over the place, from artists needing a sense of responsibility in their work so that they do not shock and shut down the audience they are trying to reach through acknowledging that it is the extreme edges of personal expression, those things that are done to shock and provoke, that bring about real conversations.
In the case of Charlie Hebdo, what they did to shock and provoke, what brought a deadly response, was universally agreed upon as wrong and abhorrent. But it was also acknowledged that many people find their satirical work to be wrong and abhorrent-though not to the point of murder.
It does not take too much imagination on my part to think of a situation where I, as a pastor and faith leader, would be criticized as two-faced for 1. condemning an artistic presentation that I considered to be inappropriate, grotesque, or disgusting while 2. speaking my heart that the artist still has the freedom to express themselves in this way.
Maybe this simply goes to the question of what art is. Yes, like defining 'art' is a simple question. It comes down to a theology of judgment for me. The day that I decide it is up to me to judge what should be expressed and what should not be expressed is the day I have stepped into Jesus' shoes. And I cannot imagine a more arrogant moment than that.
And that frees me to be passionate in my love or hatred for the art that I have the privilege of being exposed to.
The discussion went all over the place, from artists needing a sense of responsibility in their work so that they do not shock and shut down the audience they are trying to reach through acknowledging that it is the extreme edges of personal expression, those things that are done to shock and provoke, that bring about real conversations.
In the case of Charlie Hebdo, what they did to shock and provoke, what brought a deadly response, was universally agreed upon as wrong and abhorrent. But it was also acknowledged that many people find their satirical work to be wrong and abhorrent-though not to the point of murder.
It does not take too much imagination on my part to think of a situation where I, as a pastor and faith leader, would be criticized as two-faced for 1. condemning an artistic presentation that I considered to be inappropriate, grotesque, or disgusting while 2. speaking my heart that the artist still has the freedom to express themselves in this way.
Maybe this simply goes to the question of what art is. Yes, like defining 'art' is a simple question. It comes down to a theology of judgment for me. The day that I decide it is up to me to judge what should be expressed and what should not be expressed is the day I have stepped into Jesus' shoes. And I cannot imagine a more arrogant moment than that.
And that frees me to be passionate in my love or hatred for the art that I have the privilege of being exposed to.
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Why Do People Die In Fires?
Going to the heart of the work of the Fire Department, the
question to put to God, why do people die in fires? Police or military may ask why people die in
violence, but this is the FD question. I
have a very unsatisfactory answer. I do
not really know.
I have an abstract, religious-type answer, it has to do with
the fundamental evil of the universe and the sinfulness of humanity and the
brokenness of creation, but that doesn’t seem like enough. It also sounds like I am trying to defend a
God who lets people die in fires. From a
certain point of view, I am.
Why am I asking this question now? There hasn’t been, to my knowledge, a sudden
death that requires expression. It is
the same reason you send a probie through the smoke box with all their
equipment on, trying to squeeze through some narrow opening at the end. Better to challenge something now, in the
safety of practice, than when you run into the reality.
This started as a general question, but now consider the
specific. Why did that person, whom I
could not get to, have to die in that fire?
I am pretending the role of a firefighter now. It is one thing to consider the question is
the broad sense, but how about the personal?
We have an ability, as a species, to put distance between ourselves and
the tragic. On the one hand, it lets us
function, on the other hand, it lets us ignore.
There is a lot here, a lot more than one simple ‘meditation’
can answer. But if we don’t ask the question
in preparation, will we fall over the question when trying to find resolution?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)